Company Analysis Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (38.12 $) is higher than fair price (33.02 $)
- Dividends (0.87%) are below the sector average (6.24%).
- The stock's return over the last year (17.2%) is lower than the sector average (25.73%).
- Current debt level 37.38% has increased over 5 years from 30.75%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=21.23%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=23.73%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 4.4% | 3% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | 1.5% | 17% | 5.8% |
| 1 year | 17.2% | 25.7% | 9.1% |
ANCUF vs Sector: Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by -8.53% over the past year.
ANCUF vs Market: Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. has outperformed the market by 8.06% over the past year.
Stable price: ANCUF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: ANCUF with weekly volatility of 0.3307% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (38.12 $) is higher than the fair price (33.02 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (38.12 $) is 13.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (16.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.89).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (16.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.2) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.19).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.2) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.8) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.49).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.8) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.43) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.28).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.43) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 2.35% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (2.35%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.92%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (21.23%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.73%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (21.23%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (9.38%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (8.52%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (9.38%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (13.15%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.21%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (13.15%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0.87% is below the average for the sector '6.24%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0.87% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Dividend growth: Company's dividend yield 0.87% has been growing over the last 5 years. Growth over 8 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (11.4%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
