Company Analysis Xponential Fitness, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (12.8 $) is less than fair price (14.57 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=165.09%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=16.26%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.18%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-10.99%) is lower than the sector average (36.19%).
- Current debt level 63.01% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Xponential Fitness, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 4% | -43.6% | 1.7% |
| 90 days | -30.5% | -7.4% | 6.1% |
| 1 year | -11% | 36.2% | 31.4% |
XPOF vs Sector: Xponential Fitness, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -47.18% over the past year.
XPOF vs Market: Xponential Fitness, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -42.39% over the past year.
Stable price: XPOF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: XPOF with weekly volatility of -0.2113% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (12.8 $) is lower than the fair price (14.57 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (12.8 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 13.8%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (198.31) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (22.88).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (198.31) is higher than that of the market as a whole (47.35).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-5.41) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.52).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-5.41) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.57).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.5) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.5) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.08).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.48) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.51).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.48) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.75).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.55% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.55%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (165.09%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (16.26%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (165.09%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (16.86%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-3.31%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.49%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-3.31%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.56%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.4167%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.18%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (48.39%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
