Company Analysis Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (11.38 $) is higher than fair price (4 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.71%).
- The stock's return over the last year (5.7%) is lower than the sector average (14.68%).
- Current debt level 3.77% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=3.79%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.01%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0% | 0.5% |
| 90 days | 0.7% | -47.2% | 3.8% |
| 1 year | 5.7% | 14.7% | 23.4% |
WEL vs Sector: Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -8.98% over the past year.
WEL vs Market: Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp has significantly underperformed the market by -17.69% over the past year.
Stable price: WEL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: WEL with weekly volatility of 0.1097% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (11.38 $) is higher than the fair price (4 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (11.38 $) is 64.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (81.17) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (63.28).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (81.17) is higher than that of the market as a whole (70.26).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.08) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.45).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.08) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.61).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.58).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-49.18) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-77.74).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-49.18) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.37).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-76.01%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (3.79%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.01%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (3.79%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.07%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.14%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.22%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.14%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.71%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (13.96%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
