Company Analysis Viking Holdings Ltd
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (44.93%) is higher than the sector average (0.7584%).
Disadvantages
- Price (43.77 $) is higher than fair price (4.85 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.44%).
- Current debt level 55.06% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-5.46%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=12.9%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Viking Holdings Ltd | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 2.7% | -26.9% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | -5.9% | -3.3% | 7.1% |
| 1 year | 44.9% | 0.8% | 11.9% |
VIK vs Sector: Viking Holdings Ltd has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 44.17% over the past year.
VIK vs Market: Viking Holdings Ltd has outperformed the market by 33.02% over the past year.
Stable price: VIK is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: VIK with weekly volatility of 0.8641% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (43.77 $) is higher than the fair price (4.85 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (43.77 $) is 88.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (125.97) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (52.43).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (125.97) is higher than that of the market as a whole (62.2).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-87.63) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.03).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-87.63) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.84).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.6) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.23).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.6) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.02).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (27.76) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.55).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (27.76) is higher than that of the market as a whole (27.16).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-9.07%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-5.46%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-5.46%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.64%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.79%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.64%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.27%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.84%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.29%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.44%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (12.44%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
