Company Analysis Under Armour
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (6.84 $) is less than fair price (9.05 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.45%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-18.76%) is lower than the sector average (0%).
- Current debt level 30.31% has increased over 5 years from 26.86%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=10.78%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.75%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Under Armour | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.5% | -4.4% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | 21.5% | 0.6% | 5.7% |
| 1 year | -18.8% | 0% | 9% |
UAA vs Sector: Under Armour has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by -18.76% over the past year.
UAA vs Market: Under Armour has significantly underperformed the market by -27.73% over the past year.
Stable price: UAA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: UAA with weekly volatility of -0.3609% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (6.84 $) is lower than the fair price (9.05 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (6.84 $) is 32.3% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (14.34) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (52.44).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (14.34) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.55) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.04).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.55) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.5837) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.2).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.5837) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.51) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.63).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.51) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -28.56% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-28.56%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.52%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (10.78%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.75%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (10.78%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.87%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.74%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (6.41%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.62%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (6.41%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.45%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
