Company Analysis Twitter
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-4.89%).
Disadvantages
- Price (53.9 $) is higher than fair price (1.05 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.9284%).
- Current debt level 49.48% has increased over 5 years from 21.1%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.69%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=54.85%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Technology | Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -12% | 0.5% |
| 90 days | 0% | -21% | -5.3% |
| 1 year | 0% | -4.9% | 8.7% |
TWTR vs Sector: Twitter has outperformed the "Technology" sector by 4.89% over the past year.
TWTR vs Market: Twitter has significantly underperformed the market by -8.71% over the past year.
Stable price: TWTR is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TWTR with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (53.9 $) is higher than the fair price (1.05 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (53.9 $) is 98.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (21.91) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (100.69).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (21.91) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (6.93) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.16).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (6.93) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.32).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (8.07) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.19).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (8.07) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.91).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.45) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (75.25).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.45) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.05).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -18.04% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-18.04%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-14.28%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.69%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (54.85%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.69%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.12%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.8089%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.36%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.8089%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.65%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (1.78%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.18%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (1.78%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.9284%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
