Company Analysis Tupperware Brands Corporation
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (1.16 $) is higher than fair price (0.7063 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.14%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-95.16%) is lower than the sector average (-5.87%).
- Current debt level 74.08% has increased over 5 years from 21.64%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=15.15%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=59.71%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Tupperware Brands Corporation | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -2.7% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | 0% | -2.1% | 5.8% |
| 1 year | -95.2% | -5.9% | 9.1% |
TUP vs Sector: Tupperware Brands Corporation has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by -89.29% over the past year.
TUP vs Market: Tupperware Brands Corporation has significantly underperformed the market by -104.27% over the past year.
Stable price: TUP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TUP with weekly volatility of -1.83% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.16 $) is higher than the fair price (0.7063 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.16 $) is 39.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (8.93) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.16).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (8.93) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-0.4961) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.84).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-0.4961) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.0713) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.62).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.0713) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.85) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.27).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.85) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -25.07% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-25.07%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (15.15%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (59.71%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (15.15%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.98%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.94%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.98%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.14%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
