MAX
Company Analysis TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (5.65 $) is less than fair price (6.69 $)
- Dividends (17.89%) are higher than the sector average (2.67%).
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-18.35%) is lower than the sector average (3.71%).
- Current debt level 52.27% has increased over 5 years from 38.2%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=9.26%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=87.82%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.6% | -2.1% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | -14.7% | -3.9% | 3.6% |
| 1 year | -18.4% | 3.7% | 12.3% |
TPVG vs Sector: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -22.06% over the past year.
TPVG vs Market: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -30.69% over the past year.
Stable price: TPVG is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TPVG with weekly volatility of -0.35% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (5.65 $) is lower than the fair price (6.69 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (5.65 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 18.4%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (8.82) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (97.11).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (8.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.59).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.82) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.59).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.48).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.97) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.3).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.97) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.5).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (19.83) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (15.83).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (19.83) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.26).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -16.39% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-16.39%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-68.98%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (9.26%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (87.82%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (9.26%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.38%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.68%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.13%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.68%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.29%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (11.34%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (193.18%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (11.34%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.25%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 17.89% is higher than the average for the sector '2.67%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 17.89% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 17.89% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (162.55%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
