Company Analysis Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (51.93%) is higher than the sector average (14%).
- Current debt level 0.0955% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 8.9%.
Disadvantages
- Price (25.13 $) is higher than fair price (1.05 $)
- Dividends (1.19%) are below the sector average (2.97%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.3%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=16.53%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 3.7% | -4.4% | -0.5% |
| 90 days | 21.9% | -5.5% | 5.9% |
| 1 year | 51.9% | 14% | 9.2% |
TFPM vs Sector: Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 37.93% over the past year.
TFPM vs Market: Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. has outperformed the market by 42.69% over the past year.
Stable price: TFPM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TFPM with weekly volatility of 0.9987% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (25.13 $) is higher than the fair price (1.05 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (25.13 $) is 95.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (74.13) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (63.37).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (74.13) is higher than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.74) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.74) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (11.26) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.12).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (11.26) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (45.73) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-69.15).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (45.73) is higher than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -28.31% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-28.31%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-52.19%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.53%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-1.26%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-1.26%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.19% is below the average for the sector '2.97%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.19% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.92.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.19% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (115.95%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
