Company Analysis Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (14.94 $) is less than fair price (17.13 $)
- Dividends (7.2%) are higher than the sector average (2.71%).
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (15.9%) is lower than the sector average (24.75%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.76%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -6% | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| 90 days | -1.5% | 0.5% | 8.1% |
| 1 year | 15.9% | 24.7% | 32.1% |
RMM vs Sector: Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -8.85% over the past year.
RMM vs Market: Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -16.17% over the past year.
Stable price: RMM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RMM with weekly volatility of 0.3058% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (14.94 $) is lower than the fair price (17.13 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (14.94 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 14.7%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.97).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.41).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.3).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.54).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.31).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.1).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-89.78).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.02).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (-100%) is below the 5-year average return (-20%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-100%) is lower than the return for the sector (-61.45%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.76%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.9%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.57%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 7.2% is higher than the average for the sector '2.71%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 7.2% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 7.2% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
