Company Analysis CC Neuberger Principal Holdings III
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (10.95 $) is less than fair price (103.46 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.68%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (1.59%).
- Current debt level 0.0176% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=18.54%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=87.85%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| CC Neuberger Principal Holdings III | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -7.5% | -0.2% |
| 90 days | 0% | -6.4% | 3.7% |
| 1 year | 0% | 1.6% | 13.8% |
PRPC vs Sector: CC Neuberger Principal Holdings III has slightly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -1.59% over the past year.
PRPC vs Market: CC Neuberger Principal Holdings III has significantly underperformed the market by -13.79% over the past year.
Stable price: PRPC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: PRPC with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (10.95 $) is lower than the fair price (103.46 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (10.95 $) is 844.8% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (5.84) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (97.6).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (5.84) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.68).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.58).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.42).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.65).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (91.66) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (15.99).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (91.66) is higher than that of the market as a whole (36.29).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -100% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-100%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-31.95%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (18.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (87.85%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (18.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.19%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (17.11%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.18%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (17.11%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.29%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (191.69%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.07%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.68%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
