Company Analysis Ping Identity Holding Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (28.5 $) is less than fair price (37.52 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-36.11%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.8092%).
- Current debt level 27.27% has increased over 5 years from 5.84%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-14.64%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.66%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Ping Identity Holding Corp. | Technology | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -0% | 0.4% |
| 90 days | 0% | -41.9% | 6.4% |
| 1 year | 0% | -36.1% | 12.8% |
PING vs Sector: Ping Identity Holding Corp. has outperformed the "Technology" sector by 36.11% over the past year.
PING vs Market: Ping Identity Holding Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -12.84% over the past year.
Stable price: PING is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: PING with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (28.5 $) is lower than the fair price (37.52 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (28.5 $) is 31.6% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (192.25).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (56.01).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.49) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.66).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.49) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.54).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (7.71) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.02).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (7.71) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.84).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.7) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (47.19).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.7) is lower than that of the market as a whole (32.42).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 156% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (156%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.42%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-14.64%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.66%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-14.64%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.93%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-9.14%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.12%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-9.14%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.34%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-6.97%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.71%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-6.97%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.17%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.8092%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
