Company Analysis Northwest Natural Holding Company
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (4.84%) are higher than the sector average (3.2%).
- The stock's return over the last year (12.5%) is higher than the sector average (-43.77%).
Disadvantages
- Price (40.76 $) is higher than fair price (22.46 $)
- Current debt level 36.92% has increased over 5 years from 30.03%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.91%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.78%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Northwest Natural Holding Company | Utilities | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.9% | -48.6% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | -1.8% | -46.7% | 4.7% |
| 1 year | 12.5% | -43.8% | 12.2% |
NWN vs Sector: Northwest Natural Holding Company has outperformed the "Utilities" sector by 56.27% over the past year.
NWN vs Market: Northwest Natural Holding Company has outperformed the market by 0.2881% over the past year.
Stable price: NWN is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NWN with weekly volatility of 0.2405% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (40.76 $) is higher than the fair price (22.46 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (40.76 $) is 44.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (19.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (26.75).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (19.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (62.2).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.05) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.43).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.05) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.84).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.33) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.7).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.02).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.91) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.22).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.91) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.16).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 0.5393% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0.5393%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-3.71%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.91%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.78%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.91%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.55%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.47%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.55%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.27%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (4.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.26%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (4.67%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.29%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.84% is higher than the average for the sector '3.2%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 4.84% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.84% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (92.37%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
