Company Analysis Nomad Foods Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (1.52%) is higher than the sector average (-3.25%).
Disadvantages
- Price (18.71 $) is higher than fair price (12.75 $)
- Dividends (1.65%) are below the sector average (2.89%).
- Current debt level 33.24% has increased over 5 years from 30.23%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.43%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=52.71%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
18 november 16:49 US food supply is under pressure, from plants to store shelves
2.3. Market efficiency
Nomad Foods Limited | Consumer Staples | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 3.4% | -2.2% | -5.7% |
90 days | 3.4% | -2.1% | -7.3% |
1 year | 1.5% | -3.2% | 8.8% |
NOMD vs Sector: Nomad Foods Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 4.77% over the past year.
NOMD vs Market: Nomad Foods Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -7.32% over the past year.
Stable price: NOMD is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NOMD with weekly volatility of 0.0292% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (18.71 $) is higher than the fair price (12.75 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (18.71 $) is 31.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (13.44) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (41.27).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (13.44) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.51).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.9986) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.39).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.9986) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.32).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.8687) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.2).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.8687) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.92).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.55) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (26.3).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.55) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.62).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -2.89% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-2.89%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (15.59%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.43%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (52.71%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.43%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.01%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.19%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.62%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (5.01%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.22%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (5.01%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.65% is below the average for the sector '2.89%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.65% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.65% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription