Company Analysis Net Lease Office Properties
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (31.85 $) is less than fair price (33.73 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (5.64%) is higher than the sector average (-7.1%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.28%).
- Current debt level 21.02% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-14.54%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=1.96%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Net Lease Office Properties | Real Estate | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -0.3% | -47.7% | 2.6% |
90 days | 18.3% | -11.3% | 7.8% |
1 year | 5.6% | -7.1% | 11.9% |
NLOP vs Sector: Net Lease Office Properties has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 12.74% over the past year.
NLOP vs Market: Net Lease Office Properties has significantly underperformed the market by -6.25% over the past year.
Stable price: NLOP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NLOP with weekly volatility of 0.1084% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (31.85 $) is lower than the fair price (33.73 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (31.85 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 5.9%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (72.5).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.7885) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-8.76).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.7885) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.18).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (153.35).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -134.34% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-134.34%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-7.74%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-14.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.96%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-14.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-8.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.97%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-8.67%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.96%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.28%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription