Company Analysis Norwegian Cruise Line
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (58.49%) is higher than the sector average (-23.23%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=55.24%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=10.9%)
Disadvantages
- Price (26.23 $) is higher than fair price (2.78 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.36%).
- Current debt level 72.24% has increased over 5 years from 40.77%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Norwegian Cruise Line | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -7.2% | -0.5% | 0.9% |
| 90 days | -1.7% | -26.8% | 3.3% |
| 1 year | 58.5% | -23.2% | 21.4% |
NCLH vs Sector: Norwegian Cruise Line has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 81.72% over the past year.
NCLH vs Market: Norwegian Cruise Line has outperformed the market by 37.14% over the past year.
Stable price: NCLH is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NCLH with weekly volatility of 1.12% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (26.23 $) is higher than the fair price (2.78 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (26.23 $) is 89.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (53.88) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (35.14).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (53.88) is lower than that of the market as a whole (70.26).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (29.77) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.93).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (29.77) is higher than that of the market as a whole (22.61).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.05) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.02).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.05) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (93.03) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (49.12).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (93.03) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.37).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20.83% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20.83%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-54.23%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (55.24%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (10.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (55.24%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (18.07%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.8525%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.52%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.8525%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-20.04%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.22%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-20.04%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.36%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (208.73%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
