MAX Chat
Company Analysis Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (11.33 $) is less than fair price (12.34 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-0.5448%) is higher than the sector average (-14.31%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (6.88%) are below the sector average (6.88%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-17.75%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=25.97%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund | ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π· | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.1% | -18.7% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | 4% | -17.7% | 10.8% |
| 1 year | -0.5% | -14.3% | 15.2% |
NAC vs Sector: Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has outperformed the "ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π·" sector by 13.76% over the past year.
NAC vs Market: Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has significantly underperformed the market by -15.77% over the past year.
Stable price: NAC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NAC with weekly volatility of -0.0105% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (11.33 $) is lower than the fair price (12.34 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (11.33 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 8.9%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (52.32).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.87) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.9274).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.87) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.5).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.6127).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.95).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.6869).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.43).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-17.75%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.97%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-17.75%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.05%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.92%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.09%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.92%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.45%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.19%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 6.88% is below the average for the sector '6.88%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 6.88% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 6.88% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
