Company Analysis Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (33.26 $) is less than fair price (38.13 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-12.95%) is higher than the sector average (-49.84%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.82%).
- Current debt level 68.93% has increased over 5 years from 1.64%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-311.54%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=74.55%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. | Telecom | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.2% | 5.8% | 1.2% |
| 90 days | 0.2% | -2.9% | -5.2% |
| 1 year | -13% | -49.8% | 9.5% |
MSGE vs Sector: Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has outperformed the "Telecom" sector by 36.89% over the past year.
MSGE vs Market: Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -22.47% over the past year.
Stable price: MSGE is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MSGE with weekly volatility of -0.2491% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (33.26 $) is lower than the fair price (38.13 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (33.26 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 14.6%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (11.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (51.35).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (11.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-70.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.66).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-70.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.32).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.69) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.91).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.69) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.91).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (16.2) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-22.25).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (16.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.05).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -3.19% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-3.19%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (1810.35%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-311.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (74.55%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-311.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.12%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (9.77%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (9.77%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.65%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-9.27%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.38%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-9.27%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.82%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
