Company Analysis Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (33.69 $) is higher than fair price (8.2 $)
- Dividends (2.42%) are below the sector average (3.36%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-9.51%) is lower than the sector average (-7.18%).
- Current debt level 9.99% has increased over 5 years from 1.35%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-5.27%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.27%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Marcus & Millichap, Inc. | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -8.1% | -3.6% | -1.7% |
| 90 days | -7.9% | -18.4% | 4.4% |
| 1 year | -9.5% | -7.2% | 25.5% |
MMI vs Sector: Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has slightly underperformed the "Real Estate" sector by -2.33% over the past year.
MMI vs Market: Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -34.97% over the past year.
Stable price: MMI is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MMI with weekly volatility of -0.1828% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (33.69 $) is higher than the fair price (8.2 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (33.69 $) is 75.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (13.46) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (59.84).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (13.46) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.35).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.53) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.08).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.53) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.69).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.52) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.85).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.52) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-34.98) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.59).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-34.98) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.77).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -28.84% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-28.84%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-5.48%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-5.27%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.27%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-5.27%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.13%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-3.87%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.79%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-3.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (23.15%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.96%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (23.15%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.42% is below the average for the sector '3.36%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.42% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.8.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.42% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (57.91%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
