Company Analysis MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2.65 $) is less than fair price (2.86 $)
- Dividends (8.95%) are higher than the sector average (3%).
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (1.92%) is lower than the sector average (17.6%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=8.53%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=16.53%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| MFS Intermediate Income Trust | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.7% | -0.7% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | -2.2% | -2.5% | 4.7% |
| 1 year | 1.9% | 17.6% | 12.2% |
MIN vs Sector: MFS Intermediate Income Trust has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -15.68% over the past year.
MIN vs Market: MFS Intermediate Income Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -10.29% over the past year.
Stable price: MIN is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MIN with weekly volatility of 0.037% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2.65 $) is lower than the fair price (2.86 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (2.65 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 7.9%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (11.33) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (63.37).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (11.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (62.2).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.9685) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.69).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.9685) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.84).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (11.1) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.12).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (11.1) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.02).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-69.15).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.16).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -1.79% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-1.79%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-52.19%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (8.53%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.53%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (8.53%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.45%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.45%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.27%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.29%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 8.95% is higher than the average for the sector '3%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 8.95% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 8.95% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (654.53%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
