Company Analysis MFS Municipal Income Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (5.33 $) is less than fair price (10.14 $)
- Dividends (4.44%) are higher than the sector average (2.75%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=19.87%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=15.66%)
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-1.95%) is lower than the sector average (25.44%).
- Current debt level 30.62% has increased over 5 years from 26.59%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| MFS Municipal Income Trust | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.7% | 3.3% | 0.6% |
| 90 days | -5.5% | 10% | -11.2% |
| 1 year | -2% | 25.4% | 4.1% |
MFM vs Sector: MFS Municipal Income Trust has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -27.39% over the past year.
MFM vs Market: MFS Municipal Income Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -6.05% over the past year.
Stable price: MFM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MFM with weekly volatility of -0.0375% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (5.33 $) is lower than the fair price (10.14 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (5.33 $) is 90.2% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (4.82) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (63.42).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (4.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (68.46).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.8889) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.64).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.8889) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.15).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.81) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.77).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.81) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.06).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (254.09) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-54.49).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (254.09) is higher than that of the market as a whole (23.61).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -604.05% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-604.05%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-29.85%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (19.87%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (15.66%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (19.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.4%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (13.2%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.31%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (13.2%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.81%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.44% is higher than the average for the sector '2.75%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 4.44% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.44% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (21.23%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
