Company Analysis MFS Municipal Income Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (4.32%) are higher than the sector average (2.65%).
Disadvantages
- Price (5.29 $) is higher than fair price (0.1705 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (3.09%) is lower than the sector average (19.81%).
- Current debt level 33.79% has increased over 5 years from 26.59%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0.5362%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.03%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
MFS Municipal Income Trust | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0.4% | 1.8% | -0.1% |
90 days | -6.6% | -15.3% | 6.5% |
1 year | 3.1% | 19.8% | 25% |
MFM vs Sector: MFS Municipal Income Trust has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -16.71% over the past year.
MFM vs Market: MFS Municipal Income Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -21.87% over the past year.
Stable price: MFM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MFM with weekly volatility of 0.0595% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (5.29 $) is higher than the fair price (0.1705 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (5.29 $) is 96.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (156.25) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (63.15).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (156.25) is higher than that of the market as a whole (47.68).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5493) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.45).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5493) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.59).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (139.61) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.58).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (139.61) is higher than that of the market as a whole (15.21).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (254.09) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-77.74).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (254.09) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.31).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -34.53% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-34.53%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-80.32%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0.5362%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.03%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0.5362%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.3454%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.22%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.3454%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.32% is higher than the average for the sector '2.65%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 4.32% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.64.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.32% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (763.46%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription