Company Analysis Manchester United
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (19.73%) is higher than the sector average (1.4%).
Disadvantages
- Price (16.02 $) is higher than fair price (15.68 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.7%).
- Current debt level 39.41% has increased over 5 years from 38.07%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-17.05%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=23.01%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Manchester United | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1% | 0% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | -12.9% | -7.2% | 4.9% |
| 1 year | 19.7% | 1.4% | 17.3% |
MANU vs Sector: Manchester United has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 18.33% over the past year.
MANU vs Market: Manchester United has outperformed the market by 2.47% over the past year.
Stable price: MANU is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MANU with weekly volatility of 0.38% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (16.02 $) is higher than the fair price (15.68 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (16.02 $) is 2.1% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-83.74) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (32).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-83.74) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (14.27) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.23).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (14.27) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.45).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.15) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.37).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.65).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.09) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.65).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.09) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.12).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -12.84% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-12.84%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-70.17%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-17.05%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.01%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-17.05%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.58%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.11%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.19%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-16.09%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-16.09%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.09%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.7%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (106.19%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
