Company Analysis Lumen Technologies
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (4.2 $) is less than fair price (5.47 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.26%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-31.37%) is lower than the sector average (31.09%).
- Current debt level 54.21% has increased over 5 years from 53.58%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-12.49%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=82.95%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Lumen Technologies | Telecom | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 6.6% | -36.6% | -0.1% |
90 days | 11.7% | 2.2% | 18.2% |
1 year | -31.4% | 31.1% | 12.9% |
LUMN vs Sector: Lumen Technologies has significantly underperformed the "Telecom" sector by -62.46% over the past year.
LUMN vs Market: Lumen Technologies has significantly underperformed the market by -44.3% over the past year.
Stable price: LUMN is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LUMN with weekly volatility of -0.6033% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (4.2 $) is lower than the fair price (5.47 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (4.2 $) is 30.2% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (10.49) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (51.16).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (10.49) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.8).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (11.49) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (11.49) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.58).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.4069) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.82).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.4069) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.97).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.27) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.56).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.27) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.72).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -19.11% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-19.11%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (904.99%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-12.49%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (82.95%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-12.49%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (42.63%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.1629%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.75%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.1629%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.26%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (7.76%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.38%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (7.76%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.17%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.26%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (50%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription