Company Analysis Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2.07 $) is less than fair price (2.12 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (14.36%) is higher than the sector average (-8.11%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.27%).
- Current debt level 14.72% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-76.36%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=30.79%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Lanvin Group Holdings Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.4% | -1.3% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | -7.2% | -4.9% | 5.7% |
| 1 year | 14.4% | -8.1% | 9% |
LANV vs Sector: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 22.47% over the past year.
LANV vs Market: Lanvin Group Holdings Limited has outperformed the market by 5.39% over the past year.
Stable price: LANV is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LANV with weekly volatility of 0.2762% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2.07 $) is lower than the fair price (2.12 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (2.07 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 2.4%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.44).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.8695) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.63).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.8695) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-8.07) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-8.07) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -0.9353% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-0.9353%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-76.36%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (30.79%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-76.36%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-18.8%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-18.8%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.4167%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.27%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
