Company Analysis Kansas City
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (300.1 $) is higher than fair price (46.14 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.44%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (8.79%).
- Current debt level 36.28% has increased over 5 years from 33.61%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=12.99%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=24.56%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Kansas City | Industrials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0% | -2.7% | -0.5% |
90 days | 0% | 7.6% | 8% |
1 year | 0% | 8.8% | 14.6% |
KSU vs Sector: Kansas City has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -8.79% over the past year.
KSU vs Market: Kansas City has significantly underperformed the market by -14.63% over the past year.
Stable price: KSU is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KSU with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (300.1 $) is higher than the fair price (46.14 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (300.1 $) is 84.6% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (282.3) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (39.87).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (282.3) is higher than that of the market as a whole (52.32).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (6.8) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.62).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (6.8) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.5).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (9.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (84.54).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (9.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.95).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (42.12) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (16.08).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (42.12) is higher than that of the market as a whole (37.43).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -16.88% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-16.88%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.47%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (12.99%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.56%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (12.99%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.05%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (5.43%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.46%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (5.43%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.45%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (8.25%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.11%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (8.25%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.19%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.44%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (198.1%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription