Company Analysis InnSuites Hospitality Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-0.6519%) is higher than the sector average (-45.16%).
Disadvantages
- Price (1.34 $) is higher than fair price (1.02 $)
- Dividends (1.4%) are below the sector average (3.33%).
- Current debt level 59.22% has increased over 5 years from 52.72%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=11.21%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.27%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| InnSuites Hospitality Trust | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -27.1% | 4% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | -27.1% | -47.1% | 6.8% |
| 1 year | -0.7% | -45.2% | 32.2% |
IHT vs Sector: InnSuites Hospitality Trust has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 44.51% over the past year.
IHT vs Market: InnSuites Hospitality Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -32.86% over the past year.
Stable price: IHT is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: IHT with weekly volatility of -0.0125% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.34 $) is higher than the fair price (1.02 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.34 $) is 23.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (21) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (59.84).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.41).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.2) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.08).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.54).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.85).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.1).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (54.35) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (20.59).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (54.35) is higher than that of the market as a whole (22.02).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -9.47% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-9.47%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-5.52%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (11.21%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.27%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (11.21%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.9%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.33%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.79%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.57%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (5.51%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.96%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (5.51%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.4% is below the average for the sector '3.33%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.4% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.4% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (24.44%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
