Company Analysis Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.3 $) is less than fair price (0.46 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-39.51%) is higher than the sector average (-43.12%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.78%).
- Current debt level 74.81% has increased over 5 years from 42.9%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-79.28%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=36.6%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -9.7% | -31.4% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | -58.8% | -49.5% | 4.4% |
| 1 year | -39.5% | -43.1% | 17.1% |
HCWC vs Sector: Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 3.61% over the past year.
HCWC vs Market: Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -56.57% over the past year.
Stable price: HCWC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: HCWC with weekly volatility of -0.76% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.3 $) is lower than the fair price (0.46 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.3 $) is 53.3% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.46).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.57) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.09).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.66) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.63).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.66) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.49).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.16) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.05).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.16) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.65).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-85.07) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.63).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-85.07) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.11).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 29.72% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (29.72%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (105.83%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-79.28%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (36.6%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-79.28%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.58%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-14.41%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.13%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-14.41%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.19%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.78%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.1%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.78%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
