MAX
Company Analysis Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (92.43%) is higher than the sector average (-2.43%).
- Current debt level 9.17% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 16.8%.
Disadvantages
- Price (13.22 $) is higher than fair price (7.34 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.26%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=9.74%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=14.6%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 7.7% | 11.3% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | 29.9% | -7.8% | 3.6% |
| 1 year | 92.4% | -2.4% | 12.3% |
FSM vs Sector: Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. has outperformed the "Materials" sector by 94.86% over the past year.
FSM vs Market: Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. has outperformed the market by 80.09% over the past year.
Stable price: FSM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FSM with weekly volatility of 1.78% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (13.22 $) is higher than the fair price (7.34 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (13.22 $) is 44.5% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (10.16) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.83).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (10.16) is lower than that of the market as a whole (63.56).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.89) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-3.02).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.89) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.5).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.23) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.82).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.23) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.54).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (2.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.15).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (2.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.96).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 24.47% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (24.47%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (179.34%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (9.74%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.6%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (9.74%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (49.97%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (6.31%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.97%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (6.31%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.81%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (5.18%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.99%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (5.18%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.19%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.26%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
