NYSE: FRPH - FRP Holdings

Yield per half year: -1.94%
Sector: Real Estate

Company Analysis FRP Holdings

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (-1.98%) is higher than the sector average (-19.68%).

Disadvantages

  • Price (29.04 $) is higher than fair price (2.28 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.4%).
  • Current debt level 25.33% has increased over 5 years from 16.52%.
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=1.28%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.27%)

Similar companies

Iron Mountain

Macerich

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL)

Boston Properties

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

No news yet

2.3. Market efficiency

FRP Holdings Real Estate Index
7 days -2.2% -13.5% 1.9%
90 days -2.6% -26.3% 4.9%
1 year -2% -19.7% 25%

FRPH vs Sector: FRP Holdings has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 17.7% over the past year.

FRPH vs Market: FRP Holdings has significantly underperformed the market by -26.94% over the past year.

Stable price: FRPH is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: FRPH with weekly volatility of -0.038% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 230.51
P/S: 29.45

3.2. Revenue

EPS 0.2802
ROE 1.28%
ROA 0.7476%
ROIC 0%
Ebitda margin 54.26%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (29.04 $) is higher than the fair price (2.28 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (29.04 $) is 92.1% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (230.51) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (59.84).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (230.51) is higher than that of the market as a whole (47.62).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.73) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.08).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.73) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.59).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (29.45) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.85).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (29.45) is higher than that of the market as a whole (15.2).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (55.17) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (20.59).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (55.17) is higher than that of the market as a whole (19.68).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.87% over the last 5 years.

Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.87%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (21.63%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (1.28%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.27%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (1.28%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.07%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.7476%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.79%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.7476%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.96%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (25.33%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Increasing debt: over 5 years, the debt has increased from 16.52% to 25.33%.

Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage 3387.97%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.4%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.67.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
08.11.2024 DEVILLIERS DAVID H JR
Officer
Purchase 30.75 153 750 5 000
13.09.2023 DEVILLIERS DAVID H JR
President
Sale 57 5 472 96
16.06.2023 STEIN MARTIN E JR
Director
Sale 57.5 19 723 343
15.06.2023 STEIN MARTIN E JR
Director
Sale 57.5 24 898 433
14.12.2022 deVilliers David H III
Vice President
Sale 58.29 40 220 690

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription

9. Stocks forum FRP Holdings

9.3. Comments