Company Analysis Fidelity National Financial
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (3.53%) are higher than the sector average (2.71%).
- The stock's return over the last year (30.55%) is higher than the sector average (28.8%).
- Current debt level 5.97% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 8.99%.
Disadvantages
- Price (51.41 $) is higher than fair price (18.12 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.48%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.75%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
19 november 23:22 Sen. Ted Cruz explains how your 401(k) may be politicized
18 november 16:21 Major mutual fund companies double down on explaining market volatility during unrest
Other news β¨
2.3. Market efficiency
Fidelity National Financial | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -14.3% | 6.4% | 1.6% |
90 days | -2.9% | 5.6% | 6.4% |
1 year | 30.5% | 28.8% | 31.2% |
FNF vs Sector: Fidelity National Financial has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 1.75% over the past year.
FNF vs Market: Fidelity National Financial has underperformed the market marginally by -0.6794% over the past year.
Stable price: FNF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FNF with weekly volatility of 0.5875% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (51.41 $) is higher than the fair price (18.12 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (51.41 $) is 64.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (26.3) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.97).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (26.3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.35).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.82) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.3).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.57).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.15) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.29).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.08).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (24.82) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-85.16).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (24.82) is higher than that of the market as a whole (22.75).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.26% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.26%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-61.45%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.48%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.75%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.48%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.86%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.7021%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.87%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.7021%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.56%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 3.53% is higher than the average for the sector '2.71%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 3.53% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 3.53% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (96.71%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription