Company Analysis Phoenix New Media Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (92.48%) is higher than the sector average (35.16%).
- Current debt level 3.95% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 5.55%.
Disadvantages
- Price (2.92 $) is higher than fair price (2.19 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.28%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-8.37%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=-0.194%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
Phoenix New Media Limited | High Tech | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -4.8% | -5.6% | -1.7% |
90 days | -10.5% | 4.5% | 4.4% |
1 year | 92.5% | 35.2% | 25.5% |
FENG vs Sector: Phoenix New Media Limited has outperformed the "High Tech" sector by 57.32% over the past year.
FENG vs Market: Phoenix New Media Limited has outperformed the market by 67.01% over the past year.
Stable price: FENG is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FENG with weekly volatility of 1.78% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (2.92 $) is higher than the fair price (2.19 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (2.92 $) is 25% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (1.01) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (76.3).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (1.01) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.35).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.0989) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.47).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.0989) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.69).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1664) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.64).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1664) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (4.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.73).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (4.25) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.77).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -22.82% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-22.82%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-1580.67%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-8.37%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-0.194%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-8.37%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.13%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-5.83%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-0.8172%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-5.83%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-18.73%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-10.19%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-18.73%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.28%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.67.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription