FTI Consulting, Inc.

Yield per half year: +4.19%
Dividend yield: 0%
Sector: Industrials

Company Analysis FTI Consulting, Inc.

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (9.33%) is higher than the sector average (7.5%).
  • Current debt level 6.73% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 16.12%.

Disadvantages

  • Price (175.49 $) is higher than fair price (114.44 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.41%).
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=13.21%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=23.66%)

Similar companies

Delta Air Lines

3M Company

General Electric

Lockheed Martin

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.3. Market efficiency

FTI Consulting, Inc. Industrials Index
7 days -1.8% 0% 0.8%
90 days 14.2% 2.6% 4.9%
1 year 9.3% 7.5% 17.3%

FCN vs Sector: FTI Consulting, Inc. has outperformed the "Industrials" sector by 1.82% over the past year.

FCN vs Market: FTI Consulting, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -7.93% over the past year.

Stable price: FCN is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: FCN with weekly volatility of 0.18% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 24.37
P/S: 1.85

3.2. Revenue

EPS 7.81
ROE 13.21%
ROA 8.09%
ROIC 0%
Ebitda margin 10.97%

5. Fundamental Analysis

5.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (175.49 $) is higher than the fair price (114.44 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (175.49 $) is 34.8% higher than the fair price.

5.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (24.37) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (44.03).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (24.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).

5.2.1 P/E Similar companies

5.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.02) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.3).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.02) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.45).

5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

5.5. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.85) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (80.4).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.85) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.65).

5.5.1 P/S Similar companies

5.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.79) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.79) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.12).

6. Profitability

6.1. Profitability and revenue

6.2. Earnings per share - EPS

6.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 3.84% over the last 5 years.

Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (3.84%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-83.6%).

6.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (13.21%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.66%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (13.21%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.58%).

6.6. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.09%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.43%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.09%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.19%).

6.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.88%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.09%).

7. Finance

7.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (6.73%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 16.12% to 6.73%.

Debt Covering: The debt is covered by 86.45% from net profit.

7.2. Profit growth and share price

8. Dividends

8.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.41%.

8.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

8.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (302.93%) are at an uncomfortable level.

9. Insider trades

9.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

9.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
10.09.2025 Linton Paul Alderman
Chief Strategy/Transf. Officer
Purchase 34.33 410 106 11 946
09.06.2025 Lu Curtis P
General Counsel
Sale 158.6 785 546 4 953
09.06.2025 Lu Curtis P
General Counsel
Purchase 34.33 170 036 4 953
02.12.2024 Linton Paul Alderman
Chief Strategy/Transf. Officer
Purchase 36.87 273 317 7 413
20.08.2024 Holthaus Gerard E
Director
Sale 223.02 296 394 1 329

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription