Company Analysis Direct Selling Acquisition Corp.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (11.05 $) is higher than fair price (0.0377 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.71%).
- The stock's return over the last year (1.66%) is lower than the sector average (24.75%).
- Current debt level 9.76% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-12.26%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.76%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Direct Selling Acquisition Corp. | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.3% | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| 90 days | -1% | 0.5% | 8.1% |
| 1 year | 1.7% | 24.7% | 32.1% |
DSAQ vs Sector: Direct Selling Acquisition Corp. has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -23.09% over the past year.
DSAQ vs Market: Direct Selling Acquisition Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -30.42% over the past year.
Stable price: DSAQ is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: DSAQ with weekly volatility of 0.0318% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (11.05 $) is higher than the fair price (0.0377 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (11.05 $) is 99.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (20.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.97).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (20.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.41).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.79) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.3).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.79) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.54).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.31).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.1).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-36.52) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-89.78).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-36.52) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.02).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-61.45%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-12.26%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.76%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-12.26%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.9%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-8.49%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-8.49%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.57%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.71%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
