Company Analysis Sprinklr, Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (7.73 $) is higher than fair price (2.57 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.932%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-26%) is lower than the sector average (5.2%).
- Current debt level 2.72% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=8.36%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=44.86%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Sprinklr, Inc. | Technology | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.6% | -8.2% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | 16.6% | -6% | 4.1% |
| 1 year | -26% | 5.2% | 25% |
CXM vs Sector: Sprinklr, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Technology" sector by -31.19% over the past year.
CXM vs Market: Sprinklr, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -50.99% over the past year.
Stable price: CXM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CXM with weekly volatility of -0.4999% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (7.73 $) is higher than the fair price (2.57 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (7.73 $) is 66.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (71.66) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (100.43).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (71.66) is higher than that of the market as a whole (47.37).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.42) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.42) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.69).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (5.03) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.91).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (5.03) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (71.9) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (91.94).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (71.9) is higher than that of the market as a whole (17.77).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -46.28% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (-192.22%) is below the 5-year average return (-46.28%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-192.22%) is lower than the return for the sector (-19.19%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (8.36%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (44.86%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (8.36%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.14%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.57%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.08%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.57%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-81.49%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.18%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-81.49%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.932%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
