Company Analysis Cleveland-Cliffs
1. Summary
Advantages
- Current debt level 18.4% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 60.29%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.06%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=0.8101%)
Disadvantages
- Price (10.79 $) is higher than fair price (8.53 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.34%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-47.9%) is lower than the sector average (-7.75%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
18 november 17:17 High steel prices have manufacturers scrounging for supplies
2.3. Market efficiency
Cleveland-Cliffs | Materials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -8.9% | -6.2% | -2.6% |
90 days | -11.1% | -14% | -4.7% |
1 year | -47.9% | -7.7% | 12.9% |
CLF vs Sector: Cleveland-Cliffs has significantly underperformed the "Materials" sector by -40.15% over the past year.
CLF vs Market: Cleveland-Cliffs has significantly underperformed the market by -60.83% over the past year.
Stable price: CLF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CLF with weekly volatility of -0.9211% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (10.79 $) is higher than the fair price (8.53 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (10.79 $) is 20.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (26.56) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (51.69).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (26.56) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.51).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.3) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.65).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.32).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.4818) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.03).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.4818) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.92).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.78) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.91).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.78) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.62).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -117.32% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-117.32%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (853.1%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.06%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.8101%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.06%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.01%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.28%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.25%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.28%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.62%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (41.07%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (13.16%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (41.07%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.34%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.57.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (300%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription