Company Analysis MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (1.71 $) is less than fair price (2.48 $)
- Dividends (10.21%) are higher than the sector average (2.69%).
- The stock's return over the last year (8.23%) is higher than the sector average (5.74%).
Disadvantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-2.22%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=88.42%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -3.7% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | -1.2% | -1.7% | 4.9% |
| 1 year | 8.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% |
CIF vs Sector: MFS Intermediate High Income Fund has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 2.49% over the past year.
CIF vs Market: MFS Intermediate High Income Fund has significantly underperformed the market by -9.03% over the past year.
Stable price: CIF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CIF with weekly volatility of 0.16% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (1.71 $) is lower than the fair price (2.48 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (1.71 $) is 45% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (98.07).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (73.05).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.9) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.69).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.9) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.45).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (21.82) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (19.51).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (21.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (30.65).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.84).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.12).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-83.92%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-2.22%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (88.42%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-2.22%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.58%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.05%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.35%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.05%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.19%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (193.21%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.09%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 10.21% is higher than the average for the sector '2.69%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 10.21% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 10.21% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (289.78%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
