Company Analysis Central Garden & Pet Company
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (39.01 $) is higher than fair price (17.5 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.99%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-22.45%) is lower than the sector average (-8.02%).
- Current debt level 40.63% has increased over 5 years from 34.23%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.18%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=52.01%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Central Garden & Pet Company | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.6% | -1.1% | -1.5% |
| 90 days | 7.2% | -7.3% | -0.4% |
| 1 year | -22.4% | -8% | 22.5% |
CENT vs Sector: Central Garden & Pet Company has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by -14.42% over the past year.
CENT vs Market: Central Garden & Pet Company has significantly underperformed the market by -44.99% over the past year.
Stable price: CENT is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CENT with weekly volatility of -0.4317% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (39.01 $) is higher than the fair price (17.5 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (39.01 $) is 55.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (22.58) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (37.88).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (22.58) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.37).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.32).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.57) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.69).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.7619) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.94).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.7619) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.1).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.77).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -2.23% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-2.23%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.317%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.18%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (52.01%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.18%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.14%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.14%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.89%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.14%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.22%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.99%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.67.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0.5297%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
