Company Analysis BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (68.35 $) is higher than fair price (67.09 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.64%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-34.04%) is lower than the sector average (-0.3655%).
- Current debt level 40.32% has increased over 5 years from 0.224%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=8.29%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=24.42%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | Industrials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.5% | -2.4% | 0.6% |
| 90 days | -8% | -2.5% | 6.3% |
| 1 year | -34% | -0.4% | 11.6% |
BXC vs Sector: BlueLinx Holdings Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -33.68% over the past year.
BXC vs Market: BlueLinx Holdings Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -45.62% over the past year.
Stable price: BXC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BXC with weekly volatility of -0.6547% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (68.35 $) is higher than the fair price (67.09 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (68.35 $) is 1.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (16.53) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.81).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (16.53) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.83).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.36) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.85).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.36) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.82).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.2974) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.45).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.2974) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.85) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.91).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.85) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.04).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -6.88% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-6.88%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.12%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (8.29%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.42%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (8.29%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.41%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.67%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.41%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.28%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (41.64%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (12.43%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (41.64%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (9.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.64%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.8.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
