Company Analysis BB&T
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (54.24 $) is higher than fair price (51.09 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.67%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (23.86%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| BB&T | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -12.2% | 2.8% |
| 90 days | 0% | -26.4% | 2.7% |
| 1 year | 0% | 23.9% | 26% |
BBT vs Sector: BB&T has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -23.86% over the past year.
BBT vs Market: BB&T has significantly underperformed the market by -25.99% over the past year.
Stable price: BBT is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BBT with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (54.24 $) is higher than the fair price (51.09 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (54.24 $) is 5.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (62.98).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.62).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.44).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.59).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.52).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.2).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-105.04).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (19.68).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-82.49%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.07%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.22%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.67%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
