Company Analysis Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (49.3 $) is higher than fair price (46.58 $)
- Dividends (2.26%) are below the sector average (2.45%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-50.53%) is lower than the sector average (-11.01%).
- Current debt level 26.01% has increased over 5 years from 23.03%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.67%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.28%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -5.8% | -28.7% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | -23.9% | -48.4% | 4.7% |
| 1 year | -50.5% | -11% | 12.2% |
ASH vs Sector: Ashland Global Holdings Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Materials" sector by -39.51% over the past year.
ASH vs Market: Ashland Global Holdings Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -62.74% over the past year.
Stable price: ASH is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: ASH with weekly volatility of -0.9717% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (49.3 $) is higher than the fair price (46.58 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (49.3 $) is 5.5% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (25.73) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (30.18).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (25.73) is lower than that of the market as a whole (62.2).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.52) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-3.29).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.52) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.84).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.06) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.02).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.06) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.02).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.32) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (11.06).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.32) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.16).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -26.88% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-26.88%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (455.32%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.28%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.67%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.92%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.75%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.92%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.27%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (20.47%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (13.16%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (20.47%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (9.29%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.26% is below the average for the sector '2.45%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.26% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.26% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (46.15%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
