Company Analysis a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (62.18%) is higher than the sector average (9.03%).
Disadvantages
- Price (16.75 $) is higher than fair price (15.21 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.32%).
- Current debt level 27.9% has increased over 5 years from 3.61%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-66.54%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=16.26%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -12.5% | -0.2% | 0.6% |
| 90 days | -36.8% | -17.2% | 1.5% |
| 1 year | 62.2% | 9% | 22.4% |
AKA vs Sector: a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 53.15% over the past year.
AKA vs Market: a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has outperformed the market by 39.76% over the past year.
Stable price: AKA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: AKA with weekly volatility of 1.2% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (16.75 $) is higher than the fair price (15.21 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (16.75 $) is 9.2% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.88).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.68).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.6772) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.52).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.6772) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.59).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1842) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1842) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.21).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (115.3) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (10.51).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (115.3) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.31).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -158.3% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-158.3%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-66.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.26%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-66.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.08%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-27.34%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.49%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-27.34%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.4167%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.31%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.32%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
