Company Analysis Shalimar Paints Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (140.06 βΉ) is less than fair price (170.15 βΉ)
- Current debt level 15.81% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 36.2%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.1%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-30.84%) is lower than the sector average (-1.78%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-19.81%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=9.9%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Shalimar Paints Limited | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 7% | -2.4% | -5% |
| 90 days | -11.6% | -16.1% | -7.7% |
| 1 year | -30.8% | -1.8% | 9% |
SHALPAINTS vs Sector: Shalimar Paints Limited has significantly underperformed the "Materials" sector by -29.07% over the past year.
SHALPAINTS vs Market: Shalimar Paints Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -39.82% over the past year.
Stable price: SHALPAINTS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: SHALPAINTS with weekly volatility of -0.5931% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (140.06 βΉ) is lower than the fair price (170.15 βΉ).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (140.06 βΉ) is 21.5% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (48.49).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (65.67).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.26) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.26) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.56).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.41) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.41) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.88).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-29.01) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-40.63).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-29.01) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -1.93% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (104.57%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-1.93%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (104.57%) exceeds the return for the sector (-20.83%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-19.81%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-19.81%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.38%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-11.42%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.17%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-11.42%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.93%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.1%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.54%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.1%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.75.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
