Company Analysis Restaurant Brands Asia Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (82.13 βΉ) is less than fair price (110.4 βΉ)
- Current debt level 52.79% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 62.36%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.742%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-21.33%) is lower than the sector average (8.46%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-30.02%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=19.19%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Restaurant Brands Asia Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -5.6% | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| 90 days | 21.6% | 0% | 10.9% |
| 1 year | -21.3% | 8.5% | 9.8% |
RBA vs Sector: Restaurant Brands Asia Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -29.8% over the past year.
RBA vs Market: Restaurant Brands Asia Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -31.15% over the past year.
Stable price: RBA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RBA with weekly volatility of -0.4103% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (82.13 βΉ) is lower than the fair price (110.4 βΉ).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (82.13 βΉ) is 34.4% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (72.85).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (65.28).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (8.31) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.21).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (8.31) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.43).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.14) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.85).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.14) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.87).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (25.41) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.18).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (25.41) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.54).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 36.93% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (36.93%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (13.95%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-30.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.19%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-30.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.54%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-8.38%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.67%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-8.38%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.88%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.56%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.48%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.742%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
