Company Analysis Quick Heal Technologies Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (345.1 βΉ) is higher than fair price (43.02 βΉ)
- Dividends (0.4346%) are below the sector average (1.03%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-49.92%) is lower than the sector average (16.66%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.66%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=15.6%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Quick Heal Technologies Limited | Technology | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -7.1% | -5% | -0.1% |
90 days | 24.7% | 12.6% | 3% |
1 year | -49.9% | 16.7% | 2.7% |
QUICKHEAL vs Sector: Quick Heal Technologies Limited has significantly underperformed the "Technology" sector by -66.57% over the past year.
QUICKHEAL vs Market: Quick Heal Technologies Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -52.6% over the past year.
Stable price: QUICKHEAL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: QUICKHEAL with weekly volatility of -0.9599% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (345.1 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (43.02 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (345.1 βΉ) is 87.5% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (107.69) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (72.34).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (107.69) is higher than that of the market as a whole (66.04).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.97) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.39).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.97) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.6).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (8.95) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (5.37).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (8.95) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.95).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (68.98) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (23.59).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (68.98) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.96).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -13.48% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-13.48%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.5511%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.66%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.6%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.66%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.54%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.82%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.82%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.03%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.45%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0.4346% is below the average for the sector '1.03%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0.4346% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0.4346% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (54.83%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription