Company Analysis Metropolis Healthcare Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=12.26%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=10.72%)
Disadvantages
- Price (1626.1 βΉ) is higher than fair price (286.31 βΉ)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (9.58%).
- The stock's return over the last year (1.82%) is lower than the sector average (12.14%).
- Current debt level 12.67% has increased over 5 years from 3.22%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Metropolis Healthcare Limited | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2% | -1.9% | 0.1% |
| 90 days | -26.8% | -12.6% | -8.1% |
| 1 year | 1.8% | 12.1% | 1.5% |
METROPOLIS vs Sector: Metropolis Healthcare Limited has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -10.32% over the past year.
METROPOLIS vs Market: Metropolis Healthcare Limited has outperformed the market by 0.3547% over the past year.
Stable price: METROPOLIS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: METROPOLIS with weekly volatility of 0.035% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1626.1 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (286.31 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1626.1 βΉ) is 82.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (64.66) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (59.64).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (64.66) is lower than that of the market as a whole (64.71).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (7.52) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.64).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (7.52) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.37).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (6.84) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.32).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (6.84) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.79).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (28.28) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (141.6).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (28.28) is lower than that of the market as a whole (34.47).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 0.0771% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0.0771%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.48%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (12.26%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (10.72%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (12.26%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.59%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.36%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.64%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.36%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (7.91%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (13.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.91%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (13.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.54%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '9.58%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.75.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (16.04%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
