MAX
Company Analysis Libas Consumer Products Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (10.12 βΉ) is less than fair price (14.89 βΉ)
- Current debt level 13.48% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 2224.43%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.58%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-22.43%) is lower than the sector average (-7.11%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=3.24%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.73%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Libas Consumer Products Limited | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.8% | 4.4% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | -10.1% | -6% | -1.7% |
| 1 year | -22.4% | -7.1% | 10.2% |
LIBAS vs Sector: Libas Consumer Products Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by -15.32% over the past year.
LIBAS vs Market: Libas Consumer Products Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -32.65% over the past year.
Stable price: LIBAS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LIBAS with weekly volatility of -0.43% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (10.12 βΉ) is lower than the fair price (14.89 βΉ).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (10.12 βΉ) is 47.1% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (8.21) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (42.82).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (8.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.64).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.27) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.27) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.36).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.07).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.87).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.36) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (64.14).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.36) is lower than that of the market as a whole (26.34).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -65.34% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-65.34%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (3.24%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.73%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (3.24%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.7%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.38%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.66%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.38%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.62%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.38%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.72%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.58%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
