Company Analysis Global Surfaces Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (211.45 βΉ) is higher than fair price (200.17 βΉ)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.1%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-14.24%) is lower than the sector average (1.92%).
- Current debt level 28.05% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=6.32%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=9.9%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Global Surfaces Limited | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.5% | -3.4% | -2.1% |
| 90 days | -21.3% | -13.5% | -6.1% |
| 1 year | -14.2% | 1.9% | 5.4% |
GSLSU vs Sector: Global Surfaces Limited has significantly underperformed the "Materials" sector by -16.16% over the past year.
GSLSU vs Market: Global Surfaces Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -19.69% over the past year.
Stable price: GSLSU is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GSLSU with weekly volatility of -0.2738% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (211.45 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (200.17 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (211.45 βΉ) is 5.3% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (47.95) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (48.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (47.95) is lower than that of the market as a whole (65.67).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.17).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.56).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.98) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.98) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.87).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (26.9) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-40.61).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (26.9) is higher than that of the market as a whole (25.23).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -8.55% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-8.55%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-2.18%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (6.32%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (6.32%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.59%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.8%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.17%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.8%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.91%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.1%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.54%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.1%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
