Company Analysis Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (2.22%) are higher than the sector average (2.04%).
- The stock's return over the last year (82.77%) is higher than the sector average (23.98%).
Disadvantages
- Price (570 βΉ) is higher than fair price (530 βΉ)
- Current debt level 1.63% has increased over 5 years from 0.0058%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=10.7%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.78%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited | Energy | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 3.8% | -2% | -0% |
| 90 days | -4.4% | -22.9% | -0.5% |
| 1 year | 82.8% | 24% | 8.5% |
GMDCLTD vs Sector: Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited has outperformed the "Energy" sector by 58.79% over the past year.
GMDCLTD vs Market: Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited has outperformed the market by 74.3% over the past year.
Stable price: GMDCLTD is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GMDCLTD with weekly volatility of 1.59% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (570 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (530 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (570 βΉ) is 7% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (26.54) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (69.64).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (26.54) is lower than that of the market as a whole (49.85).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.84) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.41).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.84) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.96).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (6.15) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.8).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (6.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (14.27).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.38) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.83).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.38) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.35).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -368.61% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-368.61%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-12.6%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (10.7%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.78%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (10.7%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.64%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.85%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.2%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.85%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (2.25%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (15.05%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.5%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (15.05%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.72%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.22% is higher than the average for the sector '2.04%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.22% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.22% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (44.28%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
