Company Analysis Faze Three Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (342.25 βΉ) is higher than fair price (110.56 βΉ)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.7626%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-21.95%) is lower than the sector average (-11.64%).
- Current debt level 28.59% has increased over 5 years from 25.06%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=13.03%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=19.41%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Faze Three Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -5.5% | -1.6% | 1.5% |
| 90 days | -20.4% | -14.1% | -8.8% |
| 1 year | -22% | -11.6% | 0.3% |
FAZE3Q vs Sector: Faze Three Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -10.32% over the past year.
FAZE3Q vs Market: Faze Three Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -22.29% over the past year.
Stable price: FAZE3Q is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "National Stock Exchange Of India" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FAZE3Q with weekly volatility of -0.4222% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (342.25 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (110.56 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (342.25 βΉ) is 67.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (19.33) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (70.9).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (19.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (64.67).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.37) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.99).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.36).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.67) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.72).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.67) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.79).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.97) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.36).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.97) is lower than that of the market as a whole (34.46).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -19.38% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-19.38%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (11.31%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (13.03%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.41%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (13.03%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.59%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.18%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.78%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.18%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (7.91%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.5%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.54%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.7626%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (2.08%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
