Company Analysis Tattooed Chef, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.049 $) is less than fair price (0.0532 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-40.78%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.31%).
- Current debt level 26.15% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-92.58%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.88%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Tattooed Chef, Inc. | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -3% | -1.7% |
| 90 days | 0% | -48.9% | 9.4% |
| 1 year | 0% | -40.8% | 33.2% |
TTCF vs Sector: Tattooed Chef, Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 40.78% over the past year.
TTCF vs Market: Tattooed Chef, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -33.16% over the past year.
Stable price: TTCF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TTCF with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.049 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0532 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (0.049 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 8.6%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.6).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.89).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.998) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.75).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.998) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.36).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.3829) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.02).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.3829) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.23).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.27) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-58.09).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.27) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.27).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -727.5% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (43.65%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-727.5%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (43.65%) exceeds the return for the sector (-11.73%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-92.58%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.88%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-92.58%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-59.45%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.07%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-59.45%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-38.31%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.73%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-38.31%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.31%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
